Click here if you like what you see

Monday, July 27, 2009

Maid looking for a job

Hi Readers


Recently my friend took a maid to help his wife in the household chores. But his wife is not happy, and says the new maid is lazy, dishonest, a slow-learner, and last but not least she's a nuisance to the neighbourhood.


I have seen the maid, and I think there's nothing wrong with her. Nevertheless, my friend just have to please his wife, and let her go.We now have the classical damsel in distress scenario.So so sad..... !Will you please consider taking over my friend's maid. Do contact me if you are keen.


THANK YOU



























UK Couple caught by Dubai police on beach in March.

A COUPLE arrested in Dubai for allegedly having sex on a beach will face the harshest sentence after DNA tests proved they had 'full sex', media reports say. British couple Michelle Palmer, 30, and Vince Acors, 34, will stand trial on August 21 and could face up to six years behind bars after
Dubai police charged the two British tourists with having sex in public, illicit sex and being drunk in public. Both have denied the charges but reports in The Sun newspaper said DNA tests confirmed they had full sex and that Mr Acors had admitted it. It was also reported that the couple had a hasty civil marriage ceremony to reduce the sentence.
They had met hours earlier at a champagne brunch at Le Meridien Hotel, where Ms Palmer allegedly got extremely drunk before setting off for a walk along the shore with her newfound companion. A police officer later allegedly spotted the pair having sex on the sand and let them off with a caution. But the pair ignored the warning and they were arrested when the officer returned.




































Thursday, July 23, 2009

Malaysia Boleh!!!

One of the wonderful things about living in Malaysia is that we devote so much of our resources into building brain power. We love smart people in Malaysia. Parents spend an obscene amount on tuition classes.

Let’s look at some of the major initiatives by our wonderful government to increase our brain power:
1) Malaysia will produce more than 100,000 PhDs by 2012
2) Creating “knowledge” workers and “world-class” IT industry via the MSC
3) Almost all grants by MOSTI is geared towards science and technology
4) Building new universities left and right. In the 1980s we had fewer than a dozen universities — now we have more than 20 public universities and an equal number of private universities
5) “Apex” and “research” universities allocated extra millions of ringgit with the aim of getting into the top 200 university rankings
6) All sorts of academic prizes from all sorts of dubious exhibitions
7) Smart schools
8) All sorts of scholarships — JPA alone gives more than 2,000 overseas scholarships. If you include Mara and GLCs and private companies, the number is probably somewhere about 6,000-7,000 overseas scholarships plus thousands of local scholarships
9) “Brain gain” programme where we try to entice successful Malaysian scientists to come back to help our R&D
10) All sorts of government-backed programmes like the invention awards, best ICT Company, PM’s innovation awards, smart partnership, etc.

Yet, somehow we seem to be going the opposite direction. Mind you it’s been there for more than a decade already and, correct me if I am wrong; the MSC has been a dismal failure since the “knowledge” industry has not taken off and no major Malaysian IT inventions since the inception of the MSC. Cyberjaya is still years behind Singapore.

In fact, the most famous “Malaysian” IT invention — the pen drive — was invented in Taiwan by a Malaysian Chinese who could not even enter a public university here. He had to go to Taiwan, get a degree there (which is not recognised here!) and invented the pen drive there. So today, the world thinks it’s a Taiwan invention! Malaysia Boleh!

The brain gain programme is so successful that almost all the scientists who came back to work here have resigned from the public universities or government research centres, and the bulk of them have left for overseas again. Needless to say, their major complaints were racism (almost all were non-Bumiputeras) and red tape. But no one wants to admit to this since it’s not a very smart thing to admit failure.

Meanwhile we are rushing to produce 100,000 PhDs. Since most of these 100,000 PhDs will be awarded by local public universities you really have to wonder about the quality. But who cares? The important thing is to graduate 100,000 “doctors” of dubious quality so that they can train the next generation. After all, the majority of these PhDs will end up as professors in our public universities and they will supervise the next generation of PhDs. Remember the movie “Dumber and Dumber”?
Is it any wonder that our public universities’ ranking is dropping fast?

On top of that, we have decided to stop emphasising English at the high school level. No wonder international schools are celebrating — their student enrolment will go through the roof from next year onwards.

And to ensure that we have the right environment to produce “Towering Malays” and “world-class” Malaysians, the mainstream newspapers here follow the same editorial style as China’s People’s Daily and the old Soviet Union’s Pravda. Truth is not as important as propaganda and the promotion of racism and racist ideology. Malay newspapers are free to preach racism as long as they reinforce “Malay unity” and Malay dominance. News is only news if the government says so.

In the arts, local productions cannot reflect reality. How else can you explain government directives that Mat Rempits and transvestites cannot be shown on Malaysian movies and television. The way it works is like this: if we don’t show Mat Rempits and transvestites, then they do not exist! See how smart we have become because of all the government investment in educating Malaysians? Very soon, there will be no prostitutes or gay people in Malaysia.
Just to be sure, the government has just announced another round of books that are banned in Malaysia. In total more than 2,000 titles are banned in Malaysia. Some authors do not even know that their books are banned. Reading is a dangerous habit for a knowledge nation.
Meanwhile religion, or the official view of religion, is shafted down the throats of young people through television programmes and in the schools.

You really have to wonder how on earth Malaysia produces thinking citizens since all around them the system, from the mass media to the education system to the universities, is designed to damage the brain? The whole system is designed to produce a non-thinking, non-critical person who can easily be manipulated by propaganda.

It is really mind-boggling that somehow young people have managed to escape this system. Of course there are thousands who believe in the system and are basically brain dead, especially after reading the Malay newspapers and watching the local television stations. But there is a significant portion of young people out there who have managed to overcome the attempt to control their mind. I take my hat off to these young people. Without them, Malaysia will have no future.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Making out in PUBLIC in Singapore??!!














































Read this in STOMP earlier today. There are people who actually will make out in daylight and in SINGAPORE and in PUBLIC. What a damn suprise

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

QUICK UPDATE!!!

Haha, i am quite happy of the result of the poll so far on Siah Sueh and Bradley. Assuming she's commanding a fan base of nearly 10k people, we still got a 20% who don't support her. Not bad!!!!

The God must Be Crazy!!






















This is a real Graduation pictures taken over in China.. Imagine your son...

Friday, July 3, 2009

XIAXUE VS BRADLEY FARLESS (PART 2)

They just never learn...

My previous post invited a string of responses from Siah Sueh's fans. Diehard fans, I suppose.

First of all, this is MY BLOG and I am free to support whoever I wish. If you are not happy with it, so be it. You can leave whatever comments you want. I will DEFINITELY publish it as long as it's not RACIST. Come come guys, this is what blog suppose to be, freedom of speech!!! Someone with no balls to leave his/her name has commented why I need a moderation at my blog for comments and dared me to publish his/her (or maybe a shemale) comment. I DID PUBLISH it anyway. This shemale doesn't realised that her goddess, Siah Sueh, also has a comment moderation on her blog. So WTF did you comment on my moderation and not hers? Some people are just ignorant. Let's just call them stupid. Doctor said that there is forever no cure for stupidness.. So don't bother to find cures for them...

These people are just fanatics. Look at the comments that they leave at my blog and at NINO's blog.

Now, do you guys know why I supported Bradley on this fight? Okay, I admit one of the reason is just because I don't like Siah Sueh (personal). Another reason is that i don't like the way she dragged others into this. If you hate Bradley for publishing your Angmoh Wannabe's look, then just critic him, publishes his photos and tell people that he's bold. Call him Botak Jones if you want. Why do you need to drag his parents and wife into this. Calling people Filipino and Maid. WTF did the wife did about you. You sounded so racist.

Anyway, for all the fanatic fans, just critic loh....

Thursday, July 2, 2009

XIAXUE VS BRADLEY FARLESS

An interesting day!!!

While I surf the internet today, I noticed that the Singapore famous blogger's Xiaxue, is having an arguement with Bradley Farless (another semi famous blogger). The whole arguement started because of a posting by Bradley Farless on Xiaxue.

If you wanted to know more bout this fight, go and visit Xiaxue blog at http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/ (bitch, I am actually promoting your god damn blog).

P/s: Personally, I agreed with what Bradley Farless said. Don't tell the bitch okay, otherwise I might become another victim on her blog. Poor Bradley Farless, he had to delete his blog... Anyway, why this Bitch so chio? Picking up fight all the time.. First Dawn Yang, now poor old Bradley... In Dawn's case, obviously she lost... Then have to randomly pour sarcastic posting bout Dawn.. A real Bitch....

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

5 Job Interview Questions That Mean You’re Not Getting Hired…And One That Means You Are ..

Over the years I’ve worked for a couple of great companies and a bunch of mediocre to awful ones. Of the skills I developed during this time, one of the few I feel qualified to speak on at length is the interview process.

I have lost count of the number of interviews I’ve done, both applying to new companies and changing jobs within a company. I can say with confidence that in our capitalist system, job interviews are the most unpleasant, stressful, and awkward part of working - at best a necessary evil.

Many job consultants and guides to the "hidden job market" agree that the best way to find a job is to bypass the interview process altogether by finding someone at a company who can hire you directly. Most people, though, will have to do the interview in order to get in the door.

Job interviewing is a ritual in our society, and as with any ritual there are patterns. Location, dress, and demeanor are all fairly well standardized by industry. So are the kinds of questions interviewers ask interviewees.

This article focuses on a particular kind of interview question, what I call the "Not Getting Hired" question. I call them that for two reasons: One, because these questions have become such a routine part of the interviewing process that the person asking it rarely pays attention to the answer (and for good reason, as I’ll explain later). Two, because no matter how an interviewee answers the question, the information doesn’t address the key issue in any employment search.

If anything, the only real function these questions serve is in decreasing your chances of getting the job.

The Questions

"Tell me about yourself."
The vague, open-ended catch-all of interview questions. This is the candidate’s opportunity to "wow" the interviewer with a brilliant opening salvo, convincing them that by hiring you, they will get someone who will stand by them through thick or thin, hell or high water, putting the love of company above all else as the next chapter of a brilliant career is written.
Actually, this question is time-filler. It does serve some purpose – it’s a general test to see if you can string two or more sentences together. If you respond without fainting, drooling, or vomiting all over yourself, congratulations, you have passed the bare minimum requirements for social interaction. Other than that, this is a question much better suited to a blind date than a job interview.
A variation on this question is the interview that starts out with the interviewer sitting down with you, reading your resumé for the first time, and asking "It says here you worked at _______. Can you tell me about that?"
It’s a given that the two of you don’t know each other. If you did, there probably would be no need for an interview. And yet, while you have spent hours (or days) preparing for this conversation, it’s clear that the person interviewing you hasn’t even taken five minutes to look at your paperwork before you two sat down. Knowing that, ask yourself - what are the chances this person is prepared to make a decision about bring you on board?
This scenario happens a lot in larger companies where the person who makes the decision to hire or reject you is not the person who set up the interview. Often you are one of a conga line of job applicants some middle-manager is obliged to sit down with as part of the daily routine.
It’s safe to say that if the employment decision-maker has nothing to inquire about except vague generalities about your existence, you’re probably not being seriously considered for the job.

"What are your biggest flaws?"
Ideally, your answer to this question reveals valued traits of self-awareness, maturity, honesty and humility, right?
In my estimation, there’s no real reason for anyone to ask you this question. The more time you spend answering it is basically giving the interviewer more reasons not to hire you.
Also, consider that some of the biggest jackasses in history spend their lives gainfully employed despite their glaring flaws, the same shortcomings you are being asked to lay out for your prospective employer before you have spent one day working for them.
Is it like this because the world is fundamentally unfair? I would say no. It’s like this because those other people have successfully answered The One Question That Matters (more on that later).

"Where do you see yourself in 5 years?"
Quick, five years ago, did you see yourself where you are now? Probably not, because of a little thing called Life, a series of events that tend to render five-year plans useless as soon as they’re made. And considering how often companies layoff and downsize workers depending on The Economy, WHO CARES what your five year plan is?
Besides meaningless speculation about your future, this is another question that hands the interviewer reasons not to hire you. If you answer "I’m just happy sitting in a cubicle stapling reports together," the interviewer can mark in your file that you lack ambition. If you answer "I want to be CEO in ten years," they can decide that you’re too ambitious and will leave your job the second you get a better offer. There are many more ways to get the answer to this question wrong than right.

"Tell me about a time when you…"
This opening phrase is part of a technique called the behavioral interview, where the interviewer tries to get you to talk about past life experiences as evidence that you have the right makeup for the job.
Ideally, this question reveals self-awareness and self-reflection. Of the questions described here, this one gets closest to addressing The One Question That Matters. But not quite. One reason is because often the interviewer tries to get you to talk about a time when you suffered at work. They want to hear about difficult co-workers, missed deadlines, angry clients, times when you had to dig deep and give extra effort and sacrifice to accomplish miracles.
People usually don’t look good when they talk about difficult or painful experiences, no matter how upbeat they try to paint them. Once again, you’re being asked to put your worst foot forward, while the interviewer collects more reasons not to hire you (either because you didn’t handle a difficult situation correctly, or you were never in a position of difficulty, i.e. never been "tested").

"How many gas stations are in Singapore?"
This is one of an infinite number of seemingly random questions an interviewer might throw out during the meeting. If they seem nonsensical and irrelevant, it’s because they are.
I call these "MBA Bullshit Questions," because at some point the interviewer read a book or took a Management class where he or she got the idea that if an interviewee is asked a left-field question like this, the way they answer it reveals something important about how they think and approach problems.
Your answers to these trivia questions can’t really help you get the job, but they can hurt your chances if your responses aren’t to the interviewer’s liking. Come off as uninformed, flustered, too sure of yourself, not sure enough, or any other number of ways, and that’s one more reason to turn you down.
Also, consider this - if a potential employer is playing these games with you during the interview, imagine what spending 40-60 hours a week working for them will be like.

A Job Search or a Beauty Pageant?
The questions I’ve described above are more suited to a beauty pageant, a talk show interview, or a game show. The problem with these questions is they try to accomplish an impossible task – giving a person a complete picture of another person in the matter of 1 or 2 hours. All they do is create illusions that the interviewer and interviewee are having a productive dialogue that will determine if the candidate is the best person for the job.
Just like a beauty pageant contestant rehearses their performance prior to competition, a job seeker can craft brilliant responses to any of the above questions without ever having to address The One Question That Matters. Here are some examples of what you can say:
"Tell me about yourself."
"It’s always been my goal to work in the lion taming industry. I applied to your company because I want to work for the best lion taming firm in the city. I am a hard worker who will do a great job for you by decreasing your lion taming costs while increasing overall revenues."
(This is one of the few chances you'll get to brag, so go ahead and pump yourself up. Just Be sure to emphasize how much your talent and greatness will benefit the company, not the other way around.)
"What are your biggest flaws?"
"I don’t know how to sew, but I am currently taking classes at the local extension school to work on my needlepoint and cross-stitching. I think this will really help me be the best Apron Cleaner you've ever had."
(The key here is to point out a character or skill flaw that is at most tangential to the job you're applying for. Plus, always state what you are doing to correct the flaw.)
"Where do you see yourself in 5 years?"
"My main goal is to become a top-notch Associate Peanut-Brittle Maker. Somewhere down the line if there is an opportunity to become a Senior Peanut-Brittle Maker, I will give it serious consideration, but right now I think my skill set would be ideal for an Associate Peanut-Brittle maker position."
(The key here is to reinforce the idea that the job you’re applying for is the one you want, that your professional life is targeted towards doing this job instead of looking for the next one.)
"Tell me about a time when you really excelled at work."
"Oh, Wow. Let me tell you about the time my team and I had to get 200 helium balloons to the Drake hotel in three hours. It was tough because the balloon store was closed that day. I didn’t know we would make it. We searched all over the city – it was tough on everybody fighting the traffic. But we dug in and found another balloon store in Malaysia. We got the balloons there on time. I was so happy the team was able to come together to get the job done!"
(Basically, craft a story based on your personal experience that involves suffering. State clearly what the goal was and what steps you took to achieve it. Add emotions. Have one or two of these stories on hand at all times and modify them up according to how the question is asked.)
"How many gas stations are in the Singapore?"
"What an interesting question! I really don’t know the answer to it, but I could research it and get back to you."
(If you’re asked a question that has nothing to do with you, the interviewer, or the job, the best response is to compliment the interviewer on offering such an interesting and intriguing question, then say "I don’t know." Offer to research the answer and get back to her or him. Explain how you would go about getting the answer. Whatever you do, don’t guess.)
Rote questions deserve rote answers. If you prepare your own 5-6 sentence response to each of the questions above and practice them until they sound completely fluid and natural, you can walk into any office with style and confidence and interview for literally hundreds of jobs.
And you probably won’t get hired for any of them.
This is because none of these questions address The One Question That Matters.

The One Question That Matters
Before I say what The Question is, let me pose three scenarios:
*You are sitting at home when your kitchen sink springs a leak that you can’t fix. You reach for the phone book and call a plumber. When the plumber arrives you ask "before you get started, could you tell me where you see yourself in five years?"
*Your 1987 Impala has finally bit the dust. You call a tow truck to haul it away to be recycled. Before turning the keys over to the driver you ask "What are your biggest flaws?"
*You and your family are taking a trip by plane. You are all a little nervous, as most people are when flying. To assuage your fears to walk up to the pilot and ask him "How many crosswalks are in Singapore?"
Most people who read these scenarios would think they’re pretty illogical, maybe even stupid. And they would be right. But why? The main reason is these questions don’t address one huge piece of information, which is this:

"Can you do this job?"
It’s a straightforward question. Some might say it’s blindingly obvious. And yet it’s amazing how often this question is NOT asked by interviewers who instead waste everyone’s time with beauty pageant, talk show, or trivia questions.A company is in good shape if they have an interviewer who knows how to cut through the crap about 5 year plans and fundamental personality flaws and focuses on the one thing that really matters – the job they are trying to fill. The more time you and the person interviewing you spend discussing THIS question, the greater the chances are that you are being seriously considered for the position.

The Question Before the Question
Before you can provide an answer The One Question That Matters, you have to answer another question:

"What IS the job you are applying for?"
This should be another obvious nugget of information to focus on, but it’s amazing how many job applicants (myself included) have walked into interviews having no idea what specific day-to-day activities the job they are interviewing for involve.
It’s even more disconcerting how many HR professionals and hiring decision-makers also don’t know all that much about the jobs their trying to fill, especially at large corporations where they are removed from day-to-day operational activities.
Generally what happens is the HR rep brings in candidates who look "okay" on paper, hands the decision-maker the candidate’s credentials hours or minutes before the interview, and when the interviewer figures out the candidate isn’t right for the position they fall back on the beauty pageant, talk show, or trivia questions in order to kill time.
Job board descriptions and want-ads tend to contribute to the lack of information about jobs. Cutting down words that describe a position saves money, but doesn’t help to give a good picture of what a job actually involves. And, as a job seeker, if you don’t know what the job is, how can you be expected to convince anyone you are the one who should do it?
When I signed up to work for an office temp agency I told them I was very good at using Microsoft Word and Excel. They had a very good way of finding out whether I was being truthful. They put me in front of a computer and tested me on MS Office applications. The test generated a score which could objectively determine for them whether or not I could do the job. My knowledge of trivia and my grand schemes to change the world were irrelevant to the fact that I could perform a specific task well.
It’s not like this for all industries, especially ones with jobs that produce tangible outputs that can be traced back to a specific person. It’s relatively easy to judge if a person is a good plumber, doctor, race car driver, fruit picker, or chef. But many jobs today are not as cut-and-dried.

Solutions
In jobs that don’t use or require testing or certification, it’s easy for interviewers to fall back on that one short, formal meeting to figure out who is qualified, obscuring the fact that the only way you’re really going to get to know somebody is to work with them on a regular basis. In this type of environment, your chances of getting a job are at best random.
In order to better your odds by spending less time on extraneous chatter and more time getting hired, job candidates should do the following BEFORE an interview:

1. Find out specifically what the job you are interviewing for involves. Do your research by asking the hiring manager, the person who will be interviewing you, or the person who makes the hiring decision. A pre-screen phone call with one of these people, in addition to opening lines of communication prior to your meeting, is a great way to find out beforehand if you are qualified for what they are looking for, or if the job is something you would even want to do.

2. Prepare answers to questions that can prove you can do the job. Include references, old working materials, and other forms of objective proof that you are one who can complete the tasks the company needs doing. Delete the "generic resumé" from your files. Every resumé you send out should be specific to the company you are meeting with and tailored to the job you are trying to get.

3. Practice your answers to the irrelevant interview questions, but in ways that bring the conversation back to The One Question That Matters. If your interviewer insists on dwelling on beauty pageant, talk show, or trivia questions, find a way to politely but firmly let them know that you prefer to talk about the job.

The more you know about the job you’re applying for and your ability to do that job, the better off you’ll be in the jungle that is today’s job market. Happy hunting!